Dr. Matthew Teeter
Additive Manufacturing, Arthritis, Bioengineering, Biomechanics, Clinical Outcomes, Clinical Trials, Implantable & Wearable Devices, Musculoskeletal Imaging, Orthopaedic Surgery
Dr. Matthew Teeter leads the basic science research program for the Joint Replacement Institute at London Health Sciences Centre. He is a Scientist at the Lawson Health Research Institute and an Assistant Professor in the Departments of Medical Biophysics and Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry at Western University. Dr. Teeter’s research focuses on image-based orthopedic implant design and evaluation, including 3D printing technologies and imaging techniques such as micro-CT, RSA, and fluoroscopy. He has a particular interest in implant wear, and directs the Implant Retrieval Laboratory at LHSC. Dr. Teeter received his BSc in Biomedical Science from the University of Guelph and his PhD in Medical Biophysics from Western University, where he was a Graduate Fellow in Musculoskeletal Health Research and Leadership as part of the CIHR Joint Motion Program. He received national awards at all levels of his graduate and fellowship training from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. In 2012, he received the Mark Coventry Award for Best Science Paper from the Knee Society, and in 2014 he received the Canadian Orthopaedic Research Legacy Award from the Canadian Orthopaedic Foundation. Dr. Teeter has published over 25 peer-reviewed journal articles.
1. Lanting BA, Teeter MG, Vasarhelyi EM, Ivanov TG, Howard JL, and Naudie DD. Retrieval and finite element analysis of a modular neck total hip arthroplasty system. J Arthroplasty, In press.
2. Teeter MG, Milner JS, Naudie DD, and MacDonald SJ. Surface extraction provides an accurate reference for micro-CT analysis of retrieved total knee implants. Knee, 2014 Aug;21(4):801-5.
3. Teeter MG, Langohr GDG, Medley JB, and Holdsworth DW. Nondestructive microimaging during preclinical testing of novel materials for arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, February 2014, 228(2):159-64.
4. Teeter MG, McAuley JP, and Naudie DD. Fracture of two moderately crosslinked polyethylene tibial inserts in a TKA patient. Case Rep Orthop, 2014;2014:491384.
5. Pang HN, Jamieson P, Teeter MG, McCalden RW, Naudie DDR, and MacDonald SJ. Retrieval analysis of posterior stabilized polyethylene tibial inserts and its clinical relevance. J Arthroplasty, February 2014, 29(2):365-8.
6. Teeter MG, Milner JS, MacDonald SJ, and Naudie DDR. Manufacturing lot affects polyethylene tibial inserts volume, thickness, and surface geometry. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, August 2013, 227(8):884-9.
7. Teeter MG, Seslija P, Milner JS, Nikolov HN, Yuan X, Naudie DDR, and Holdsworth DW. Quantification of in vivo implant wear in total knee replacement from dynamic single plane radiography. Phys Med Biol, May 2013, 58(9):2751-2767.
8. Paterson NR, Teeter MG, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, and Naudie DD. Mark Coventry Award: A retrieval analysis of high flexion versus posterior stabilized tibial inserts. Clin Orthop Rel Res, January 2013, 471(1):56-63.
9. Seslija P, Teeter MG, Yuan X, Naudie DDR, Bourne RB, MacDonald SJ, Peters TM, and Holdsworth DW. Measurement of joint kinematics using a clinically available single-perspective flat-panel radiography system. Med Phys, October 2012, 39(10):6090-6103.
10. Paterson NR, Teeter MG, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Howard JL, and Naudie DD. Highly crosslinked vs. conventional polyethylene: No differences in rim notching from micromotion on retrieved acetabular liners. J Arthroplasty, October 2012, 27(9):1616-1621.e1.